![]() Such claims haven’t satisfied the critics, however, who remain alarmed as the potential to rapidly produce images and texts derived from the style and technique of other artists threatens creative professions, as the potential to flood the Internet with limitless fields of unauthored content threatens to drown out human insight, and as research methods are collapsed into a black box that spits out plausible (though potentially erroneous) answers. And machine intelligence has the powerful potential to solve problems that have eluded solutions in the past. ![]() Exploration of these tools in a public way does not exactly replace us, but it alters the landscape in which we work. But picking through the cliches, there are some good points to be found: The long march towards automation has been happening long before ChatGPT made it public. This chorus tends to equate criticism with moral panic, luddism, and romanticism. These more substantive possibilities are at the heart of the technophilic narrative. However, these tools are also being explored for their research, journalistic, and problem-solving potential. The potential for “creative” or “entertaining” output seems to have absorbed much of the popular engagement with the tool. By now, we’ve all seen it: Textual prompts fed into a machine generate complex artifacts, from images to videos, from stylized prose to lyrical ballads. Specifically, I am referring to the rise of ChatGPT and a host of related “artificial intelligence” applications (really LLMs) that have been an object of intense consideration and public debate in recent months. But it is in today’s digital media that we see an intensification of the struggle between the competing views outlined by Plato. In more recent years, the poststructuralists have generally taken aim at Plato for his idealism and his views on government (but mainly for his idealism) and have come down in favor of the Sophists, who they generally see as aligned with a kind of ontological openness that takes form in the discursive interplay of argument. Plato’s Gorgias outlines Socrates’ famous takedown of the eponymous Sophist, whose rhetoric he compares to flattery. Just remember to use it wisely, and you’ll be golden, bro. It’s a valuable tool that can help you succeed in today’s world of fast-talking, highly persuasive business and politics. So, in conclusion, Plato totally missed the mark when it came to sophistry. And that’s where sophistry comes in, dude. It’s about getting your message across and winning over your audience. ![]() In the world of business and politics, it’s not always about being right or truthful. The truth is, sophistry is a powerful tool that can be used for good or evil, depending on the intentions of the speaker.Īnd let’s be real, bro. Sure, some people might say that sophistry is all about deception and manipulation, but that’s just haters talking, man. ![]() It’s all about using language and persuasion to win over your audience, bro. In today’s fast-paced, highly competitive world, you gotta be able to sell yourself and your ideas if you wanna succeed. I mean, sure, he was all about seeking truth and wisdom through rational discourse and dialectic, but he totally overlooked the power of persuasion and rhetoric. Me: Speaking like a tech bro, can you give me an anti-platonic defense of sophistry?ĬhatGPT: Dude, absolutely! When it comes to sophistry, Plato totally had it wrong, bro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |